Draft 'test outline' for Server product (what will be the broad scope of Server testing?)

"Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" johannbg at gmail.com
Sat Apr 26 00:10:22 UTC 2014

On 04/25/2014 10:59 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-04-25 at 22:35 +0000, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
>> On 04/25/2014 09:43 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>>> we at least need to get the requisite new test
>>> cases and matrix templates (or whatever) drawn up, and decide on whose
>>> responsibility all the testing we ultimately decide to do will be.
>> Just keep those test matrix and test cases along with their own release
>> criteria within the relevant WG's product wiki space and once those are
>> ready we remove the overlapping bits from the "general" release criteria
>> and test matrix if any ( which most likely will just boil down to
>> anything in relation the workstation WG )
>> And there is nothing to decide on whom will be doing all that testing
>> It's their product, they designed it, they maintain it, they test it,
>> they release it.
>> Yes it's really that simple...
> Well, no it isn't. "They" are part of the Fedora project. So are "we",
> and we're allegedly the bit that's responsible for quality assurance.

It was just matter of time that you change tunes of lack of resources 
and started chanting in having us do all their work but facts remains 
facts our obligation is to the installer, core and base.

Anything built on top of that is not ours to cover but relevant service 
sub community or WG if you prefer.

In the end of the day nobody knows the product better then those who 
built it and whom better to test it then those same persons.


More information about the test mailing list