Release criterion proposal: "Package sets" (Alpha and Beta)

[Adam Williamson]

On Tue, 2014-12-23 at 10:21 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> The "Package sets" criterion for Alpha currently reads:
> 
> "When doing a graphical install using the dedicated installer 
> images, the installer must be able to install each of the release 
> blocking desktops, as well as the minimal package set."
> 
> This was drafted prior to Product-ization. It has a bug - you can't 
> do that from the Server DVD, and that's intended - and two problems -
> it's too focused on desktops for the new Product-y world, and the 
> 'graphical' restriction seems arbitrary (TUI should work regarding 
> package sets too). It also is missing something: there's no
> requirement about what the *default* package set should be.

Just for the record, this proposal was prompted by noticing the 
default package set for Rawhide boot.iso is wrong since the switch to 
dnf by default. If anyone else notices that, I've already filed the 
bug:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177002

if this proposal is accepted, that bug can be a Beta blocker.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net