Secretary duty instructions added to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting

[Mike Ruckman]

On Mon, 13 Jan 2014 15:54:34 -0800
Adam Williamson <awilliam at redhat.com> wrote:

> Hi, folks. Just wanted to let the group know I added a section
> covering secretary duty to the blocker meeting SOP:
> 
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting#Secretary_Duty
> 
> as this is fairly uncontroversial stuff just explaining an
> already-existing process I didn't think it needed drafting in advance
> - we're not setting policy here, just explaining how to do something
> that already happens. But as always, comments / questions /
> suggestions / complaints welcome! Especially from anyone else who's
> done secretary duty, or anyone who's been interested but intimidated.
> Those who've done it before, did I cover everything? Correctly? Those
> who've never done it but would quite like to, does this look like an
> understandable explanation? Would it give you the confidence to
> volunteer as the secretary at a blocker review meeting and feel like
> you could do a good job based on these instructions?
> 
> Thanks!

Looks good to me.

// Roshi
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 490 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/attachments/20140113/c232d187/attachment.sig>