Did anyone's F20 system randomly "reboot" after updating from updates-testing just recently?

[Dan Mossor]

On 01/16/2014 08:49 AM, Chris Murphy wrote:
>
> On Jan 16, 2014, at 7:44 AM, Chris Murphy <lists at colorremedies.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> On Jan 16, 2014, at 7:14 AM, Dan Mossor <dan.mossor at outlook.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 01/16/2014 01:10 AM, Ankur Sinha wrote:
>>>> There's something off somewhere. I just fresh installed from the Alpha USB
>>>> stick I had. I ran a dnf update which went OK, other than the usbmuxd
>>>> scriptlet failure which iirc is a known issue. After that, I got down to
>>>> installing my other packages and I get quite a few scriptlet failures now:
>>>>
>>>>    1 warning: %post(perl-libs-4:5.18.2-289.fc20.x86_64) scriptlet failed,
>>>> exit status 127
>>>>
>>>> <Snipped>
>>>
>>> I ran into this problem yesterday myself on a fresh install. It first cropped up during the update to KDE 4.12, and I asked Rex Dieter in the KDE channel about it. I managed to copy the output from the sddm install, and this is our brief convo about it. He seems to think it is a systemd problem:
>>>
>>> [12:05] <danofsatx> Non-fatal POSTIN scriptlet failure in rpm package sddm-0.2.0-16.20130914git50ca5b20,fc29,x86_64
>>> [12:05] * rdieter checks sddm packaging
>>> [12:06] <danofsatx> warning: %post(sddm-0.2.0-16.20130914git50ca5b20,fc29.x86_64) scriptlet failed, exit status 127
>>> [12:06] <rdieter> odd, looks like systemd's fault
>>> [12:06] <rdieter> it just has:  %systemd_post sddm.service
>>> [12:07] <rdieter> hrm, maybe missing runtime dep
>>> [12:07] <rdieter> nope, %{?systemd_requires}
>>> [12:08] <rdieter> wierd
>>>
>>> I did a final update last night to bring everything up to speed with the updates-testing repo enabled, and got this output - it's too much to paste in the email so it's on paste.fedora:
>>> http://paste.fedoraproject.org/68957/89881516/
>>>
>>> Summarization: I'm getting A LOT of scriptlet failures with exit status 127. Any clues what that exit status means, and what's broken?
>>
>> Me too. It can't be systemd-208-11 because I don't have that installed, I still have the original one F20 installs with which is 208-9. I haven't tracked down what's causing this but it must be something in u-t.
>
> Who having this problem has *NOT* been using dnf?
>
> Chris Murphy
>
I forgot to mention that - I haven't typed the letters dnf at all on 
this system until I wrote this email.

Yum is what I know, yum is what I use.

Also forgot to mention that I have systemd-208-9.fc20.x86_64

-- 
Dan Mossor
Systems Engineer at Large
Fedora QA Team Volunteer FAS: dmossor IRC: danofsatx
San Antonio, Texas, USA