Proposed generic release criterion: service manipulation
mitr at redhat.com
Mon Jul 7 14:45:09 UTC 2014
----- Original Message -----
> On 07/04/2014 03:22 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > System service manipulation
> > It must be possible to start, stop, enable and disable system
> > services using the initialization framework's standard commands.
> > I don't think it needs any footnotes beyond standard 'References'.
> > Does this seem reasonable to everyone? Thanks!
> Is this another way of saying "All services must provide a systemd
> unit file"?
Same question here. I’ve never heard of an “initialization framework” before, I'd guess that’s the piece of code and conventions to run .ctors. Just saying systemd would simplify things (though, perhaps s/must provide/must be controlled by/ ?)
More information about the test