Test Plan location for 389

[Amita Sharma]

On 05/23/2014 02:58 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-05-22 at 20:22 +0530, Amita Sharma wrote:
>
>>> Thanks for working on this. I'm curious as to the context: is this
>>> really a Fedora-level effort, or is it more 389-ds upstream-level? What
>>> are the other test plans you are planning to work on? Thanks!
>> Hi Adam,
>>
>> I have updated http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:Test_Cases with
>> 389 test cases section as you suggested.
> Thanks for that! But I think the category name might need to be changed.
> The name part has to match the name of the source package - that's how
> Bodhi knows which test cases to show for which updates, it looks in the
> wiki for a category called "Package_(source_package_name)_test_cases".
Thanks for the reply Adam
  I accept your comment , it should be "Package_389-ds-base_test_cases"
>
> It looks like there is a '389-ds' package, but it only contains a couple
> of directories and some dependencies - that is, it's basically a
> metapackage. It very rarely gets updated, so we don't want the test
> cases associated with that package, because then people testing updated
> 389-ds bits won't see them.
>
> It looks like the 'real' 389 source packages are:
>
> 389-ds-base
> 389-ds-console
> 389-console
> 389-admin
> 389-admin-console
> 389-adminutil
> 389-dsgw
There are many ::
===============
389-ds-base-1.2.11.15-33.el6_5.x86_64.rpm
389-ds-base-libs-1.2.11.15-32.el6_5.x86_64.rpm
-- These rpms are for the basic Directory Server Instance.

389-admin-1.1.34-1.el6.x86_64.rpm
389-admin-console-1.1.8-1.el6.noarch.rpm
389-admin-console-doc-1.1.8-1.el6.noarch.rpm
389-admin-debuginfo-1.1.34-1.el6.x86_64.rpm
389-adminutil-1.1.17-1.el6.x86_64.rpm
389-adminutil-debuginfo-1.1.17-1.el6.x86_64.rpm
389-adminutil-devel-1.1.17-1.el6.x86_64.rpm
--- These are for Admin Server.

389-console-1.1.7-1.el6.noarch.rpm
389-ds-console-1.2.7-1.el6.noarch.rpm
389-ds-console-doc-1.2.7-1.el6.noarch.rpm
--- These are for Directory Server Console

389-ds-base-debuginfo-1.2.11.15-32.el6_5.x86_64.rpm
389-ds-base-devel-1.2.11.15-33.el6_5.x86_64.rpm
--- These are devel and debuginfo rpms
>
> I don't know enough about 389 to know which test cases should be
> associated with which source package, but I guess you do. So create
> "Package_(source_package_name)_test_cases" categories for each source
> package for which you have relevant test cases, and put the right test
> cases in the right categories :)
So here again  As you said "REAL RPMS" are only few and I don't think we 
should categories the test cases on the basis of rpms because one or 
more rpms are dependency rpms, serving single purpose.

Rather, we can have 2 major categories
1. 389-ds-base (which will cover various features of DS like password 
policy, SSL etc.)
2. 389-console (which will cover admin and console functionality)
>
>> Created http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_389_Directory_Server
>> and http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_389_Directory_Server
> That's the same link twice - is that what you meant? I guess you'll also
> convert the other tests from the test plan page into separate test
> cases?
awww.. I meant 
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_389_Directory_Server and
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:Package_389_test_cases :P
>
>> My aim is to put some efforts in fedora QA, 389 is my work area so I am
>> starting up with it.
> Thank you very much!
Thanks :)
>
>> Also I want to know if I can organize a test day for 389 with community
>> testers?
> Absolutely, that would be great - Mike already replied, and he can help
> you with the organization.
Yeah.. I got his mail.

Thanks & Regards,
Ami