Test Plan location for 389

Amita Sharma amsharma at redhat.com
Mon May 26 11:29:23 UTC 2014


On 05/23/2014 10:59 AM, Amita Sharma wrote:
> On 05/22/2014 09:22 PM, Mike Ruckman wrote:
>> On Thu, 22 May 2014 20:22:47 +0530
>> Amita Sharma <amsharma at redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 05/17/2014 12:39 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>>>> On Fri, 2014-05-16 at 12:06 +0530, Amita Sharma wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> I have created
>>>>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:2014-05-16_Allow_turningoff_vattr_lookup_Test_Plan 
>>>>>
>>>>> for one of the new feature in 389.
>>>>> I want to add it to upstream test plans, but I am not sure where it
>>>>> should go exactly,
>>>>> 1. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:Test_Plans
>>>>> 2. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:Test_Cases
>>>>>
>>>>> Please suggest the correct location because I am going to add many
>>>>> more.
>>>> I'd say it would go in category:test_plans, as it's clearly a test
>>>> plan not a test case. Note we do have several existing FreeIPA test
>>>> cases - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:FreeIPA_Test_Cases
>>>> - though no 389-ds specific ones I know of. I would probably just
>>>> name it "QA:Allow_turning_off_vattr_lookup_Test_Plan" - I guess you
>>>> copied the inclusion of a date from the 'anaconda usability test
>>>> plan', but that was done because that test plan was actually tied
>>>> to an event occurring on a specific date, it's probably not
>>>> necessary/appropriate for this test plan.
>>>>
>>>> My personal inclination would be to create individual test case
>>>> pages using the test case template for each of the test cases you
>>>> currently include as entries in the "How" column of the table - it
>>>> might make the table a bit cleaner, and it would also have the
>>>> advantage that if we ever do implement a better TCMS, we'd probably
>>>> be able to migrate your cases to it automatically (we're vaguely
>>>> assuming we'll write some kind of script to hoover up all pages
>>>> using the 'test case' template and convert them to whatever TCMS we
>>>> eventually, possibly, use).
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for working on this. I'm curious as to the context: is this
>>>> really a Fedora-level effort, or is it more 389-ds upstream-level?
>>>> What are the other test plans you are planning to work on? Thanks!
>>> Hi Adam,
>>>
>>> I have updated http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:Test_Cases with
>>> 389 test cases section as you suggested.
>>> Created
>>> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_389_Directory_Server and
>>> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_389_Directory_Server
>>>
>>> My aim is to put some efforts in fedora QA, 389 is my work area so I
>>> am starting up with it.
>>> Also I want to know if I can organize a test day for 389 with
>>> community testers?
>>>
>>> Thanks & Regards,
>>> Ami
>> Ami,
>>
>> You can for sure organize a test day! Usually test days happen during a
>> branched release like Alpha or Beta - but if it's useful for 389
>> development we can schedule one and organize it. I can help you out
>> with the organization if you like as well.
>>
>> // Mike
> Thanks Mike,
>
> I would like to pick up a 389 feature in which dev has made changes 
> recently like password policy or  automember etc for the test day. 
> Where I can setup the test VMs for the test day and Can we have it in 
> second week of June sometime?
Hi,

Can anyone answer my queries please?

Thanks,
Ami
>
> Regards,
> Ami



More information about the test mailing list