Draft Fedora 21 Test Plan
Mike Ruckman
roshi at fedoraproject.org
Tue May 27 19:30:23 UTC 2014
On Tue, 27 May 2014 07:58:55 -0400
Matthew Miller <mattdm at fedoraproject.org> wrote:
<snip>
>
> Yeah. If something isn't working, do you think the best path is QA->WG
> directly, or should it be QA says something to FESCo, FESCo works
> with WG?
>
> Since parts of this are new to all of us, and other parts new to a
> lot of us, maybe it'd be good to put suggested/reasonable deadlines
> on some parts of the responsibilities? That helps put in focus what
> needs to be done.
>
>
FWIW, I think it makes the most sense from a collaboration standpoint to
have QA and the WGs talk directly. Having fewer steps to go through
makes things go faster.
// Mike
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 490 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/attachments/20140527/78fde36a/attachment.sig>
More information about the test
mailing list