conflict between latest fedora-release and systemd (rawhide)

Stephen Gallagher sgallagh at redhat.com
Thu Jun 11 17:38:31 UTC 2015


On Thu, 2015-06-11 at 11:24 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Jun 2015 11:55:47 -0500
> Bruno Wolff III <bruno at wolff.to> wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 09:27:18 -0600,
> >   Kevin Fenzi <kevin at scrye.com> wrote:
> > > On Thu, 11 Jun 2015 10:01:04 -0500
> > > Bruno Wolff III <bruno at wolff.to> wrote:
> > > 
> > > > That change also caused problems installing stuff with generic
> > > > release that depend on lvm2. For example you can't build a 
> > > > generic
> > > > live image that will have anaconda on it for live installs.
> > > 
> > > Is there a bug? I'm not sure how that happened from this 
> > > change...
> > 
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1224561
> 
> Ah, nifty. ;( 
> 
> > > > I think the idea was to have product (edition) dependent 
> > > > presets,
> > > > but I don't think the implementation was done well.
> > > 
> > > No, the idea was to move presets from systemd that didn't want to
> > > have to change them to fedora-release that makes more sense and 
> > > is
> > > controlled by more Fedoray folks who can make changes as needed.
> > 
> > fedora-release seems to be getting more complicated. This makes it
> > hard for generic-release to stay caught up as a separate package. I
> > would like to see generic-release merged into the fedora-release
> > source rpm so that it is easier to keep in sync, if that is 
> > possible
> > to do while still solving the trademark problem it is meant to 
> > solve.
> 
> I'm not sure it is, but hopefully we can come up with something. 
> 
> Perhaps a easier way to merge changes from the fedora->generic one or
> something. 
> 


It really *can't* be included in the same source RPM, because remixes
wouldn't be able to ship the source, then.

However, there's something to be said for including them together in
the same upstream project and generating separate tarballs from the
same source.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/attachments/20150611/643f6fb4/attachment.sig>


More information about the test mailing list