Workstation 23 (Beta) locking up

linux guy linuxguy123 at gmail.com
Tue Oct 6 23:34:24 UTC 2015


Upgrade to kernel 4.2.2-300.   I finally got it running and it is very
stable.  Not a single freeze or crash or kernel oops.

For what it is worth, Plasma 5.4.2 looks and works great.

On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 3:42 PM, Sanne Grinovero <sanne.grinovero at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Thanks for all suggestions, I tried to apply them and this is what I got.
> While I don't use the Android Studio I did often use Eclipse and other
> Java heavy processes in the past days (I'm a Java developer playing
> with big data, so the heavy apps idea sounded interesting).
>
> So today I've been leaving the laptop on, but without using it at all:
> just logged in Gnome 3, no apps running.
>
> After some hours it crashed, and (after waiting a bit and then
> rebooting), this is the output of `journalctl -b -1` after restarting
> it:
>
> Oct 06 22:33:06 t440.slug rtkit-daemon[840]: The canary thread is
> apparently starving. Taking action.
> Oct 06 22:33:06 t440.slug rtkit-daemon[840]: Demoting known real-time
> threads.
> Oct 06 22:33:06 t440.slug rtkit-daemon[840]: Successfully demoted
> thread 5579 of process 5564 (/usr/bin/pulseaudio).
> Oct 06 22:33:06 t440.slug rtkit-daemon[840]: Successfully demoted
> thread 5576 of process 5564 (/usr/bin/pulseaudio).
> Oct 06 22:33:06 t440.slug rtkit-daemon[840]: Successfully demoted
> thread 5571 of process 5564 (/usr/bin/pulseaudio).
> Oct 06 22:33:06 t440.slug rtkit-daemon[840]: Successfully demoted
> thread 5564 of process 5564 (/usr/bin/pulseaudio).
> Oct 06 22:33:06 t440.slug rtkit-daemon[840]: Successfully demoted
> thread 1572 of process 1560 (/usr/bin/pulseaudio).
> Oct 06 22:33:06 t440.slug rtkit-daemon[840]: Successfully demoted
> thread 1569 of process 1560 (/usr/bin/pulseaudio).
> Oct 06 22:33:06 t440.slug rtkit-daemon[840]: Successfully demoted
> thread 1566 of process 1560 (/usr/bin/pulseaudio).
> Oct 06 22:33:06 t440.slug rtkit-daemon[840]: Successfully demoted
> thread 1560 of process 1560 (/usr/bin/pulseaudio).
> Oct 06 22:33:06 t440.slug rtkit-daemon[840]: Demoted 8 threads.
> Oct 06 22:33:16 t440.slug rtkit-daemon[840]: The canary thread is
> apparently starving. Taking action.
> Oct 06 22:33:16 t440.slug rtkit-daemon[840]: Demoting known real-time
> threads.
> Oct 06 22:33:16 t440.slug rtkit-daemon[840]: Successfully demoted
> thread 5579 of process 5564 (/usr/bin/pulseaudio).
> Oct 06 22:33:16 t440.slug rtkit-daemon[840]: Successfully demoted
> thread 5576 of process 5564 (/usr/bin/pulseaudio).
> Oct 06 22:33:16 t440.slug rtkit-daemon[840]: Successfully demoted
> thread 5571 of process 5564 (/usr/bin/pulseaudio).
> Oct 06 22:33:16 t440.slug rtkit-daemon[840]: Successfully demoted
> thread 5564 of process 5564 (/usr/bin/pulseaudio).
> Oct 06 22:33:16 t440.slug rtkit-daemon[840]: Successfully demoted
> thread 1572 of process 1560 (/usr/bin/pulseaudio).
> Oct 06 22:33:16 t440.slug rtkit-daemon[840]: Successfully demoted
> thread 1569 of process 1560 (/usr/bin/pulseaudio).
> Oct 06 22:33:16 t440.slug rtkit-daemon[840]: Successfully demoted
> thread 1566 of process 1560 (/usr/bin/pulseaudio).
> Oct 06 22:33:16 t440.slug rtkit-daemon[840]: Successfully demoted
> thread 1560 of process 1560 (/usr/bin/pulseaudio).
> Oct 06 22:33:16 t440.slug rtkit-daemon[840]: Demoted 8 threads.
> Oct 06 22:33:26 t440.slug rtkit-daemon[840]: The canary thread is
> apparently starving. Taking action.
> Oct 06 22:33:26 t440.slug rtkit-daemon[840]: Demoting known real-time
> threads.
> Oct 06 22:33:26 t440.slug rtkit-daemon[840]: Successfully demoted
> thread 5579 of process 5564 (/usr/bin/pulseaudio).
> Oct 06 22:33:26 t440.slug rtkit-daemon[840]: Successfully demoted
> thread 5576 of process 5564 (/usr/bin/pulseaudio).
> Oct 06 22:33:26 t440.slug rtkit-daemon[840]: Successfully demoted
> thread 5571 of process 5564 (/usr/bin/pulseaudio).
> Oct 06 22:33:26 t440.slug rtkit-daemon[840]: Successfully demoted
> thread 5564 of process 5564 (/usr/bin/pulseaudio).
> Oct 06 22:33:26 t440.slug rtkit-daemon[840]: Successfully demoted
> thread 1572 of process 1560 (/usr/bin/pulseaudio).
> Oct 06 22:33:26 t440.slug rtkit-daemon[840]: Successfully demoted
> thread 1569 of process 1560 (/usr/bin/pulseaudio).
> Oct 06 22:33:26 t440.slug rtkit-daemon[840]: Successfully demoted
> thread 1566 of process 1560 (/usr/bin/pulseaudio).
> Oct 06 22:33:26 t440.slug rtkit-daemon[840]: Successfully demoted
> thread 1560 of process 1560 (/usr/bin/pulseaudio).
> Oct 06 22:33:26 t440.slug rtkit-daemon[840]: Demoted 8 threads.
> Oct 06 22:33:36 t440.slug rtkit-daemon[840]: The canary thread is
> apparently starving. Taking action.
> Oct 06 22:33:36 t440.slug rtkit-daemon[840]: Demoting known real-time
> threads.
> Oct 06 22:33:36 t440.slug rtkit-daemon[840]: Successfully demoted
> thread 5579 of process 5564 (/usr/bin/pulseaudio).
> Oct 06 22:33:36 t440.slug rtkit-daemon[840]: Successfully demoted
> thread 5576 of process 5564 (/usr/bin/pulseaudio).
> Oct 06 22:33:36 t440.slug rtkit-daemon[840]: Successfully demoted
> thread 5571 of process 5564 (/usr/bin/pulseaudio).
> Oct 06 22:33:36 t440.slug rtkit-daemon[840]: Successfully demoted
> thread 5564 of process 5564 (/usr/bin/pulseaudio).
>
> [repeated over and over for several pages]
>
> I then repeated the cycle, but with an open SSH terminal from my other
> workstation (Fedora 22).
> Again after some hours the system seemed locked up again. But the SSH
> terminal was not disconnected!
> I eventually got the "Broken Pipe" message, terminating the SSH
> session, only after I forced it off. So I guess it was not entirely
> dead?
>
> Is this information enough for you to guess something, or should I go
> ahead and try the F24 kernels?
>
> Thanks again!
> Sanne
>
>
>
> On 6 October 2015 at 09:45, Kamil Paral <kparal at redhat.com> wrote:
> >> Yes it's an Intel one, and yes I'm using a dock but it's only to get
> >> it charged conveniently and connect to other perks - such as wired
> >> network and input devices - but the dock has no monitor attached.
> >>
> >> I've had the lockups happen frequently when travelling; been away for
> >> 2 weeks now: that implies no dock at all for many days, and even with
> >> several reboots between the last time it was in the dock (obviously,
> >> because of the issue itself).
> >
> > So it's not dock then.
> >
> > When the device locks up, try to connect to it from PC2 over ssh and
> inspect the logs. If that doesn't work, wait a few minutes to make sure all
> data is synced (provided the system is at least a bit alive), and then
> reboot and inspect last boot logs with `journalctl -b -1`. (Using sysrq is
> very helpful here, sysrq+reisub).
> >
> > If that doesn't work either (the cause of the lock-up is not in the
> logs), you can also try connect from PC2 over ssh while your computer is
> working fine, run `journalctl -f` to follow the logs, and then wait until
> your computer locks up. Hopefully you'll see at least some useful info
> before it stops communicating over the network.
> >
> > As a rule of thumb, you can also try different kernels. You should still
> have some F22 kernels installed, try them (or install them manually from
> Koji). Then also try latest F24 non-debug kernels [1]. That will give you
> additional data points.
> >
> > [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/KernelDebugStrategy
> > --
> > test mailing list
> > test at lists.fedoraproject.org
> > To unsubscribe:
> > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
> --
> test mailing list
> test at lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/attachments/20151006/2fe6ea11/attachment.html>


More information about the test mailing list