fallout from elvis -> fedorahosted move

Ankitkumar Rameshchandra Patel ankit at redhat.com
Wed Apr 2 05:43:27 UTC 2008

Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Bill Nottingham (notting at redhat.com) said: 
>> Dimitris Glezos (dimitris at glezos.com) said: 
>>> On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 10:58 PM, Bill Nottingham <notting at redhat.com> wrote:
>>>> Was there supposed to be a step where the old repositories were
>>>>  removed from elvis?
>>> According to the final elvis move plan, we did.
>>>   http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/RFR/FinalElvisMove#plan
>> OK, I've run into at least one module where this didn't happen. Do I
>> need to go through and look for others?
> CC'ing Ankit and Chester. What exactly did you do for this step?
> Bill
I guess we made a mistake here by deleting *only PO files* instead of 
the entire modules from elvis. But, I think we informed 
fedora-devel-list redhat com, fedora-devel-announce redhat com and of 
course fedora-trans-list redhat com too about the migration... 

Ankit Patel

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/trans/attachments/20080402/7737d6ed/attachment.html 

More information about the trans mailing list