Remove specspo statistics?
apeter at redhat.com
Wed Mar 19 04:40:38 UTC 2008
Asgeir Frimannsson wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 12:39 AM, Ankitkumar Rameshchandra Patel
> <ankit at redhat.com> wrote:
>> Alexander Todorov wrote:
>> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> > Hash: SHA512
>> > Ankitkumar Rameshchandra Patel wrote:
>> > | Hi,
>> > |
>> > | Can we remove specspo/desc, specspo/summary statistics from the
>> > | individual language statistics page? I am not sure about other teams, I
>> > | personally don't like to see it on Gujarati Statistics page. So, I
>> > would
>> > | like to remove specspo statistics from
>> > | http://translate.fedoraproject.org/languages/gu/fedora-9 page.
>> > |
>> > | I would like other teams to opt-in, if you also prefer to do the same.
>> > | May be, we could request the infrastructure team or Dimitris to remove
>> > | the specspo statistics from the individual language statistics page.
>> > |
>> > Before other teams can opt for this can you share your reasoning? Do
>> > you simply
>> > don't like these particular two because they are extremely large? I
>> > guess users
>> > who don't speak English will be happy to see package descriptions in
>> > their
>> > native language. Why removing them from the stats page then?
>> Just look at the statistics of the module "specspo".
>> http://translate.fedoraproject.org/module/specspo Do you see any
>> language completed more than even 50%? No...
>> The reason is obvious, it's too huge to translate and another reason
>> would be I think, it's not really important for the "end users" too, who
>> actually use "Localized Desktops". For them package summary or
>> description doesn't make much difference as they understand the use of
>> packages through help files/manuals only. They don't go by RPM specs -
>> summary or descriptions I think. So, most of the language coordinators
>> are not translating this package.
>> So, I would like it to be removed from the *individual language
>> statistics page only*, Not from the "individual module translation
>> statistics page".
>> It will help me to track the progress of translation of my language, for
>> the important/core packages only.
>> Still, I am not so keen on getting this removed from the statistics
>> page, but thought may be other language coordinators too thinking the
>> same thing, so expressed my idea.
>> Thread is open for the inputs I think...
> What about moving specspo to the "Various Fedora resources" release
> set, rather than having it under F8, F9 etc..? In this way, it will
> show up on (using pt_BR as example):
> but it will not show up on:
+1 for moving specspo as another set and gaving it under F9 etc.
More information about the trans