fallout from elvis -> fedorahosted move
dimitris at glezos.com
Wed Mar 26 21:28:24 UTC 2008
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 10:58 PM, Bill Nottingham <notting at redhat.com> wrote:
> Was there supposed to be a step where the old repositories were
> removed from elvis?
According to the final elvis move plan, we did.
> We ran into a case today where for one module (system-config-keyboard)
> the only thing that was done is that at some point the translations
> were 'cvs rm'd, leaving all the code there (which, by the way, is
> a horribly broken way to try to disable the repo). Development was still
> going on in the elvis repository, and now we have divergent trees.
Jabber ID: glezos at jabber.org, GPG: 0xA5A04C3B
"He who gives up functionality for ease of use
loses both and deserves neither." (Anonymous)
More information about the trans