Tx support for plural forms and other questions

Miloš Komarčević kmilos at gmail.com
Fri Sep 25 17:56:35 UTC 2009


Hi peeps,

Hoping someone will be able to shed some light on the following. I
have asked Dan to support ngettext in setroubleshoot [1] and found
positive response and a fix already.

However, the POT generated by Tx differs to the one checked in by the
developer in Hg. So the questions are:

1. Does Tx POT generation at all support extraction of ngettext
strings from an intltoolized project? If so, why doesn't it extract
them in this case?

2. Why does Tx even generate a POT file when there is one checked in?
Difficult to decide which takes precedence, I know. If the project is
intltoolized, then we can ask the developer not to check in the POT
any more, but it would then be nice if ngettext extraction worked...

Thanks,
Miloš

[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524990




More information about the trans mailing list