When is the next FLP meeting?

shaiton shaiton at fedoraproject.org
Tue Oct 19 08:02:45 UTC 2010


On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 8:43 AM, noriko <noriko at fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> shaiton さんは書きました:
>> On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 1:06 PM, Mostafa <lashar at fedoraproject.org> wrote:
>>>  On 10/13/2010 02:20 PM, Dimitris Glezos wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 1:40 PM, Runa Bhattacharjee <runab at redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>> Shankar Prasad Venkateshbhat wrote:
>>>>>>   Hi folks,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> By looking at Past Meeting [1] and Next Meeting [2] sections it has been
>>>>>> long time since any meeting happened.
>>>>>> Are we planning to meet any where soon?
>>>>> Another round of +1 from me. FLSCo members, thoughts?
>>>> +1. We need to take some decisions and a meeting would help answer questions.
>>>>
>>>> -d
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> +1 for me. just arrange it
>>>
>>> --
>>> Mostafa Daneshvar
>>>
>>> http://mostafadaneshvar.com
>>>
>>> Fedora Ambassador
>>>
>>> --
>>> trans mailing list
>>> trans at lists.fedoraproject.org
>>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/trans
>>>
>>
>> Why do we need one? Please, share your mind :)
>> (at least, there is the transifex 0.7 issue, which is going to be
>> solved soon (hope)).
>>
> Sorry replying late.
> +1 for having a meeting, as we have not one for long.
> I think of a couple of agenda.
>
> * Tx Upgrade
> Thank you so much to Doming and many of you, Tx is under upgrading to
> 0.9.0. Now, the decision needs to be made if translate.fp.o is upgraded
> to 1.0. Yes means we need resource for upgrading, No means we need to
> know what to do when 0.9.0 comes eol., I think..

Are you sure that it is *under upgrading*? Nobody answered at this
question on the ticket. And I didn't get a chance to ask on irc.
Furthermore, I can't see any discussions on the devel mailing list...
neither in the infra one.
That's why I have asked if it's not better to upgrade directly to TX 1.0.

>
> * FLScO
> We have not had any election for long. How you think?


> * Meeting
> The meeting is for translators. Do we need a meeting? How could we have
> a meeting to get maximum attendance? how often a meeting to be held?

-1 for me
I am sure that many translators won't be able to join it. Ok, there
are not so many translators reading the L10n irc chan, and not so many
reading that, am sure. The question is probably first "who want to
attends this meeting?".
All that could be done at a meeting time, could be done on the mailing
list. The mailing list is where the more translators could interact.
We just need to take care of the thread. Therefore, for me, there
should be one thread by important subject.

 * At least one for "Do we need to upgrade to Transifex 1.0 or should
we first upgrade to Tx 0.9.1?" (This thread would concern the infra.)
I won't start it because I can't understand the need of upgrading only
to tx 0.9 for the trans side.

-- 
Kévin Raymond
GPG-Key: A5BCB3A2


More information about the trans mailing list