Is the FLSCo running our teams alone?
noriko.mizumoto at gmail.com
Wed Jul 18 01:58:34 UTC 2012
On 2012年07月18日 08:25, Domingo Becker wrote:
> 2012/7/16 Dimitri Glezos<glezos at transifex.com>:
>> On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 1:52 AM, Kévin Raymond
>> <shaiton at fedoraproject.org> wrote:
>>>> So maybe this is a good time to discontinue FLSCo and just have, like
>>>> GNOME, a couple of 'spokespeople' for FLP.
>>> Yep, we can just drop all FLSCo references, even rename the cvsl10n
>>> FAS group to simply l10n.
>>> And define a clear process to handle team creation, change of team
>>> coordinator (like filling ticket, do we have a BZ component?) and why
>>> not a l10n-maintainer FAS group to know who bother in case of team
>>> administration needs.
>> Sounds like a plan to me.
> I did a couple of Team creation last march and I found what the
> process should be at least.
> Sorry my bad. I forgotten to update the wiki pages accordingly.
> - Presentation letter to trans list.
> - Membership in cvsl10n fas group.
> - The new maintainer should edit L10N_Teams page  at the wiki.
> - Edit owners.list  which contains information for bugzilla
> components and submit it to trans list so a L10N admin guy would
> review it and upload it to the git repo.
> I saw some new Team creation requests. We can check these steps again
> and process those pending requests. Anyone interested, please start
> with the first step, the presentation letter to this list.
>  http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/L10N_Teams
>  http://git.fedorahosted.org/git/?p=l10n/owners.git;a=blob_plain;f=owners.list;hb=master
Thanks Domingo, it is clear!
The page for maintainer  may be needed to update accordingly.
Btw, do we still need cvsl10n group membership?
> kind regards
> Domingo Becker (es)
> trans mailing list
> trans at lists.fedoraproject.org
More information about the trans