xinetd - needed?

[Hal Burgiss]

On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 12:01:55PM -0200, Alexandre de Abreu wrote:
> >
> >I may be wrong, but services under xinetd can't run *unless* xinetd is
> >running.
> >
> 
> That's right. Xinetd service must be started.

Well, you can certainly run any 'services under xineted' as standalone
services if you wanted to, eg sshd. I think that's the OP's point,
that he is bypassing xinetd, and therefore why even run it at all.

-- 
Hal Burgiss