Running RAID in a Fedora System

Michael Gargiullo mgargiullo at warpdrive.net
Tue Dec 9 14:39:20 UTC 2003


On Tue, 2003-12-09 at 09:23, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Dec  9, 2003, Hans Müller <ndof at gmx.li> wrote:
> 
> > raid 10 when 1 disk in the raid1 and 1 disk in the raid0 part fail
> 
> This claim doesn't make sense.  There's no such thing as the raid1
> and raid0 parts.  RAID 10 is a RAID 0 array built atop of a collection
> of RAID 1 arrays.

I always thought that RAID 10 was just a mirrored RAID 0 set.

> 
> What you meant, and that part is correct, is that if you lose all
> disks in the same RAID 1 set, the entire RAID10 array is toast.
-- 
Michael Gargiullo <mgargiullo at warpdrive.net>
Warp Drive Networks





More information about the users mailing list