two gripes about Evolution ...

[Rui Miguel Seabra]

On Tue, 2003-12-16 at 14:45, Rodolfo J. Paiz wrote:
> Removing or omitting the ability to mark sent messages with higher or lower 
> priority is NOT a good thing. It removes choice, which you so fervently 
> espouse. Having that choice does not force anything upon the recipient. 
> Evolution is going to lose points with most corporate users, and many other 
> folks, for not having this. Why-oh-why would this become an issue of rights 
> and choice? Good grief!

This is better suited in the evolution mailing lists, specially if
accompanied with code or a bounty.

You can also make a subject like:
 [URGENT] about my retirement plan...

Rui

-- 
+ No matter how much you do, you never do enough -- unknown
+ Whatever you do will be insignificant,
| but it is very important that you do it -- Gandhi
+ So let's do it...?

Please AVOID sending me WORD, EXCEL or POWERPOINT attachments.
See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20031216/c8d4e8e0/attachment-0002.bin