rpm --nodeps vs. yum/apt
William Hooper
whooperhsd3 at earthlink.net
Thu Dec 18 16:29:50 UTC 2003
Clif Smith said:
> To elaborate more on my scenario... When we're ready to begin QA, I
> grab all of the latest appropriate RPMs for our environment via up2date
> on RHN and store them in a central repository. So, within that
> repository, I've got a set of updates, including their dependencies,
> from which I can build systems tailored for the version of our product
> we need to QA against. So, while I agree with the concerns mentioned
> below in a normal environment, I believe that this will work just fine
> in my QA environment. True/Not true?
The bigger question is why? You have the updates and the dependencies,
what does nodeps help with? As I stated before, give the list of RPMs to
rpm and it will figure out the order for you. The whole point of having a
package manager is to make sure all the dependancies are resolved.
Using nodeps should be looked at like using "rm -rf" as root. It can be
useful in a small set of situations, but it is very easy to completely
break things if you get in the habit of using it all the time.
--
William Hooper
More information about the users
mailing list