pgp signature test

[David C. Hart]

On Sat, 2003-12-27 at 11:01, Simon Perreault wrote:
> On December 27, 2003 10:50, David C. Hart wrote:
> > Kmail is much more efficient but still lacks
> > some features.
> 
> Really? What features do you find lacking?

I have become accustomed to Evolution's VFolders. "Lacking" is probably
the wrong term. I - personally - find the migration from Evolution
difficult. KMail is certainly lighter on resources - MUCH. I haven't
used it enough - so I'm not 100% sure - but I *think* that Evolution
leaves the IMAP mailboxes on the server open while KMail logs in and out
each time that it checks mail. That's probably a good thing as well.

I'm talking myself into more experimentation with KMail as I type. I
just wish that I could convert filters, setting and the address book a
la Outlook to Eudora.

                               ---------
            Quality Management - A Commitment to Excellence
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20031227/66a745a5/attachment-0002.bin