[Re: [Re: no graphical boot since last kernel update]]

Don R Maxwell don.maxwell at usa.net
Wed Oct 29 21:38:39 UTC 2003


Michael Kearey <mutk at iprimus.com.au> wrote:

> Sean Middleditch wrote:
> 
> >>Hmm . From dmesg :
> >>	Kernel command line: ro root=LABEL=/ rhgb
> >>In my grub.conf
> >>	kernel /boot/vmlinuz-2.4.22-1.2110.nptl ro root=LABEL=/ rhgb
> >>
> >>
> >>And I still boot in plain old text [ Ok ] thing. Any other tips? (Not 
> >>that I care *that* much about it)
> > 
> > 
> > Just to double check, you do have rhgb still installed, yes?  Also, are
> > you sure there are no typos in your sysconfig GRAPHICAL=yes line?
> 
> rpm -q rhgb
> rhgb-0.11.1-2
> 
>  From /etc/sysconfig/init:
> 
> # anything else => new style bootup without ANSI colors or positioning
> BOOTUP=color
> # Turn on graphical boot
> GRAPHICAL=yes
> 
> 
> Still no graphical boot. Quite odd.

Ditto. Or at least from one machine.  I have two machines running test3.  One
works with graphical boot, the other does not.  The one that does not is an
OLD HP Vectra VL.  It has a P2 and 128MB RAM.  The one that does work is a
little Compaq Presario with a Celeron and 320MB.  Neither has any of the new
fancy graphics cards.  The fact that they differ in this relatively minor way
is indeed odd.








More information about the users mailing list