Res res at
Wed Apr 7 23:23:39 UTC 2004

On Tue, 6 Apr 2004, Dave Cross wrote:

> On Tue, Apr 06, 2004 at 09:54:48AM +1000, Res wrote:
> > On Mon, 5 Apr 2004, Erik P. Olsen wrote:
> >
> > > Instead, you could go to the archive and display the list in
> > > threaded mode. Then you'll see your mistake.
> >
> > CBF, not my problem if mailman spits the dummy, also wouldnt be the
> > first time its screwed up posts,
> Well, it's not just Mailman. I read my email in mutt using a threaded
> view and that also shows your email as a reply.

err mailman is the dumb list manager that RH uses not my client, it has
numerous bugs hence why my network will never touch it, we had bad
experience once with it, never again, ive never known it to screw up like
this but theres a first for everything.

> If, as you insist, you started the original email as a brand new mail,
> then you need to explain why it has the "References:" and "In-Reply-To"
> headers. No decent email program would add those to a new email.
> Dave...

r e a d  a b o v e

im justifying myself to bunch of idiots who wont accept it might be the
list manager, your problem, not mine.



More information about the users mailing list