Huge Partition
Martin Stone
martin.stone at db.com
Wed Apr 21 14:46:38 UTC 2004
Martin Stone wrote:
> Bill Gradwohl wrote:
>
>>> what did it say?
>>
>>
>>
>> Here's the script I used:
>>
>> for ((i=0; i<2100; ++i)); do
>> cp x FILE.$i
>> done
>>
>> The "x" file is just under 1GB big. I expected the script to fail at
>> roughly
>> the i=2000 mark.
>>
>> At the i=1001 point, I just got a string of "... no space left on
>> device."
>> messages from cp.
>>
>> BTW - while this loop was executing, I was getting about 1GB/min via
>> the cp
>> command. You say you're getting 1GB every 10 seconds. How are you
>> doing it?
>> The box I'm using is a 2 CPU XEON @2.4Ghz with 2G RAM running absolutely
>> stock FC1 - no patches whatsoever. I don't believe any patches would
>> address
>> this issue.
>>
>
> I'm doing:
>
> while true; do dd if=/dev/zero of="`date`" bs=1048576 count=1024; done
>
> Because I'm extremely lazy ;-) My system is dual 2.8 GHz Xeon with 2 GB
> RAM, with two Escalade 7506 controllers, each of which has 8 300 GB
> drives attached as a RAID 10 - 300GB * 8drives / 2mirrored = 1200 GB /
> 1024megs-in-a-gig = 1.17 TB. I created my ext3 fs'es with a very large
> number of inodes (1 per 4K) so the overhead is higher than normal. df
> -k reports the total size as 1135170164 K = 1.05 TB. I'm also running
> stock FC1, the only exception being that I did install the 2.4.22 kernel
> update build 2179.
>
> 36 GB to go... I'll wait until it completes to send this...
>
> OK it got done. Final output from df -k is:
>
> /dev/sdc1 1135170164 1135170164 0 100% /export/home
> /dev/sdd1 1135170164 699617620 376959076 65% /export/data
>
> So the full 1.05 TB got filled up with nary a problem.
>
> Here's my strong suggestion to you: Using fdisk, remove your partition
> and recreate it. Then remake your ext3 filesystem, and see what
> happens. I still have this feeling like parted is wack.
>
> Good luck, and please let me know how it goes!
>
> Martin
Oh, also, just to be clear, I created these filesystems before I ever installed
that updated kernel RPM... so I don't think that's the problem.
More information about the users
mailing list