Security updates are too slow or none existant

[Bart Martens]

On Sun, 2004-02-08 at 02:49, Chuck Mize wrote:
> On Sat, 2004-02-07 at 16:59, Ernest L. Williams Jr. wrote:
> 
> > Yes, and I did not have to pay for Debian either!  
> > I am just trying to make a valid point.  
> > I like Fedora but that does not mean that the original e-mail thread was
> > invalid.  
> > Fedora does have room for improvement.
> 
> Can you name any security exploits that exist that haven't been
> addressed?

You also seem to be denying that there is a difference in speed of
releasing security updates for rh9 and fc1. Have you compared the
updates lists and the src.rpms?