Security updates are too slow or none existant

[Matthew Miller]

On Sat, Feb 07, 2004 at 07:54:35PM -0800, Chuck Mize wrote:
> infrastructure as the current Redhat offerings. If you are really
> concerned about these types of minor security updates then you shouldn't
> use Fedora until the infrastructure is in place that allows the
> community to address them.

I think it's fair to be *concerned* about such things. If the attitude of
"well it's free, so don't expect much" were the default, Linux in general
wouldn't be as far as it is. One can either take complaining messages as
whining and flame back, or one could use it as a starting point for a
discussion about just how that needed infrastructure is going to come into
being.

-- 
Matthew Miller           mattdm at mattdm.org        <http://www.mattdm.org/>
Boston University Linux      ------>                <http://linux.bu.edu/>