is it just me?

[redhat]

I guess if I were to have checked to see that the fedora update site had
changed I would not have had these problems with up2date.  And, yes, I
am using up2date with fedora - and when the URL is correct it works much
better.  I have not tried yum.  I like the little icon in the lower
right corner with up2date - is there something similar with yum or is it
just command line?
DF

On Wed, 2004-02-18 at 12:53, Harry Hoffman wrote:
> Do you mean the Redhat up2date service (ala rhn.redhat.com)? Cause I'm not
> seeing that behavior at all. I'm using RH9 and everything works as expected (or
> at least as I expect it to).
> Or do you mean you're running Fedora and trying to use up2date? If so, don't do
> that! :-) Try "yum" with Fedora.
> 
> HTH,
> harry
> 
> Quoting redhat <redhat at fayelectric.com>:
> 
> *> Is it just me or is up2date kind of sucking pretty bad these days?  It
> *> seems like many of the packages are unsigned and if you are not watching
> *> the progress of each package it just stops with a pop up message.  What
> *> ever happened to Red Hat's online service that enabled users to maintain
> *> servers through a browser?  I actually paid for a couple of my servers
> *> to be part of that and really liked it.  Is there anything like that
> *> with Fedora?  Just curious.  BTW, I am having to load individual
> *> packages with up2date to get it to work correctly.  Maybe the server is
> *> overloaded?
> *> DF
> *> 
> *> 
> *> --
> *> fedora-list mailing list
> *> fedora-list at redhat.com
> *> To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
> *> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Harry Hoffman
> hhoffman at ip-solutions.net
> 
> -------------------------------------------------
> This mail sent through IpSolutions: http://www.ip-solutions.net/
>