RH now exiting 1 more data center

AMAZING POWERS OF OBSERVATION m_epling at comcast.net
Sun Feb 22 00:59:44 UTC 2004


    yes i am to and even tho i agree with your answere i respect it . i
know nothing of slackware so i supose wre even lil
On Sat, 2004-02-21 at 18:36, Res wrote:

> On Sat, 21 Feb 2004, AMAZING POWERS OF OBSERVATION wrote:
> 
> >     sometimes other than security ...you may not need an upgrade . my
> > fedora box has been ruining since the release . i will do a complete
> > new  install when fc 2 stable comes out . if your maintaining that many
> > computers  . id go get red hat enterprise .    unless its a cheap
> > company .
> 
> The fact of the matter is the RH9 and slackware boxes have no problems.
> I can not afford to keep a fedora box online just to see its next crash
> and debug it, our clients expect a working reliable service, they get it
> off slackware and they get it off RH9, we will use what works for minimal
> inconvenience to our clients, I said  initially it was a sad day RH went
> this way and this proves it,  only 2 fedora boxes, they both F up after
> around the same time, they both need to be rebooted daily ( fuck me, if i
> want to reboot a machine daily  ill install windows ) its beyond a joke
> and is taking up engineeers time when they could be doing beter things.
> 
> 
> >    then just let us know what happen and we can QA it . unless you dont
> > know what your doing   .  if u need to flam me do it off the board
> 
> no i prolly dont, after all ive only been with RH since 6 months after
> they first kicked off, with with slackware for 10 years, solaris, hpux
> digital. ur right im a clueless fuckin idiot.
> much like you id say.
> 
> 
> > .                      On Sat, 2004-02-21 at 17:30, Res wrote:
> >
> > > Well ive listened to the other bashers and those ones who think Fedora
> > > will be better than the RH we knew....I maintain about 40 slackware
> > > boxes, 2 fedora and 3 RH9. since the last round of updates the 2 fedora
> > > boxes have died several times without reason, total lockup on kernel
> > > panics. the other boxes incl rh9 just chug away like they are not even
> > > there, because  RH 9 will cease to get supporot in 2 months, i will be
> > > going into the data center today to piss off the 2 fedora boxes and
> > > replace them with slackware, and sadly,in a couple months or whenever i
> > > get sick ofmanually making and applying updates, the 2 RH9 boxes will go
> > > to slackware as well... I find it unacceptable that fedora is now the
> > > winblow$ on the linux world., as I and numerous
> > > other loyal RH's since almost day one saw this lack of QC with these
> > > fedora changes, I am not at all suprised.
> > >
> > > I do not know what checking process is in place now with this 'open co
> > > munity' bullshit but its F'in pathetic QC compared to the old.
> > >
> > >
> >
> 
> -- 
> Regards,
> Res
> 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20040221/7132a8ce/attachment-0002.html 


More information about the users mailing list