ifconfig bug?

[P. Thompson]

>>> jvian10 at charter.net 02/23/04 08:14PM >>>
>Is there an eth0 defined??

Yup, see my other reply.

>I can think of another time where this might be of concern.  I usually 
>think of eth0:0 as equivalent to the base device eth0 and thus begin my 
>aliases as eth0:1.  I do not know if this is required, but maybe someone 
>can answer that.

The first time I tried was with an eth0:1.  I was afraid the problem was 
that I skipped 0 so the next time I tried eth0:0.  Same results.

Thanks for the reply
Paul