RH now exiting 1 more data center
Res
res at ausics.net
Tue Feb 24 21:33:23 UTC 2004
On Mon, 23 Feb 2004, Joe Klemmer wrote:
> > > Slackware. There's just to much missing from it. I know it can do the
> > > job just fine but the maintenance of a Slack box is astronomical
> > > compared to any of the other distros. You would probably be better
> >
> > actually no, its about the same as RH.
>
> On what planet?
On Earth lamer, we've run em both side by side, no more maint has had to
be given to the slackware boxes than any RH box.
> FC1 is as stable for servers as RH9 ever was. The only disadvantage to
> Fedora on REAL servers is it's update cycle. It will cost a lot more in
what rubbish, see my original post.
>
> I'm guessing that you did an upgrade from the 7.3 boxes to FC1. That's
No! clean installs on both.
> FC1 is much more reliable and stable than RH8 ever dreamed it could
who said anything about 8? never used 8 at all.
> be. And you must be forgetting about the 2.x, 3.x, 4.x, 5.x, 6.x days
> as well. Fedora is not bullet proof. Neither was RH9. If you want
RH9 is bullet proof on the 3 RH9 boxes remaining.
More information about the users
mailing list