RH9 and FC1

[Jeff Vian]

Chadley Wilson wrote:

>On Thu, 2004-02-26 at 19:23, Jim Bradley wrote:
>  
>
>>FC1 differs in alot of ways as far as hardware support, but it doesn't 
>>look much different from RH9 as far as the desktop goes, mostly just a 
>>different background. I will say this. I've been having a tougher time 
>>with usb devices under FC1. I din't have any trouble with my usb devices 
>>under rh9.
>>I don't know about other people, but I went the upgrade route, rather 
>>than a full new install, and it took a long time. About 5 hrs to complete.
>>
>>Jim
>>
>>Awuku Danso wrote:
>>
>>    
>>
>>>Hi all
>>>Just want to know how FC1 differs from RH9. Would anyone say it's an upgrade of RH9 and if so could I install (upgrade) FC1 over RH9? Or does it have to be installed onto a different partition/hard disk?
>>>
>>>Thanks
>>>
>>>
>>> 
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>This is odd! I have 2 different digital cams a usb2 flash mem stick,
>a flat bed usb scanner a webcam and a cannon printer. All work fine and
>i use 2 port at the back of the PC for the printer and scanner the rest
>I plug in randomly when needed into the front ports. 
>Never even had the slightest hitch and as I said earlier I have 3 months
>uptime. no reboots. and whats more is I didnt even have driver probs.
>mmm.
>
>  
>
Chad,
Which usb scanner are you using.?  I have a canon D660U, but have not 
yet tried it on the FC1 box.  It will not work on RH9.

>
>
>  
>