Configuring additional packages
jdangler at atlantic.net
Wed Jul 21 22:00:00 UTC 2004
jdangler at genofit.com
From: fedora-list-bounces at redhat.com [mailto:fedora-list-bounces at redhat.com]
On Behalf Of Aaron Gaudio
Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2004 5:55 PM
To: For users of Fedora Core releases
Subject: Re: Configuring additional packages
On Wed, 2004-07-21 at 17:45 -0400, John Dangler wrote:
>> I have had to download sources for httpd, php, etc for my existing FC2
>>installation (originally installed from .iso). I noticed that the
>>executable for httpd is currently installed in /usr/sbin, and the modules
>>are currently installed in /usr/lib/httpd. Is it safe to configure httpd
>>to be installed in the same paths as the original, or is it more advisable
>>to begin using /usr/local for these (and other added packages) and clean
>>up the existing entries afterward?
> I would recommend using /usr/local for packages not installed from rpm
> (unless other constraints such as network storage are at play), or using
> the sources to build new rpms for installation.
> Otherwise, overwriting the files provided by an rpm installation will
> confuse rpm and cause its database to no longer reflect reality.
Thanks for the reply. Do I then need to clean up the existing versions, or
is there a utility of some kind for 'sync-ing' the two, or do I not need to
worry about them?
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list at redhat.com
To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
More information about the users