rpm or pam bug?

Thomas Zehetbauer thomasz at hostmaster.org
Fri Jul 23 09:23:08 UTC 2004


Hi,

whenever I upgrade some packages for which there are i386 and x86_64
versions installed the configuration files are created as .rpmnew or
saved as .rpmsave files. Comparing these files almost always shows that
they are identical.

rpm -q --queryformat '%{NAME}-%{VERSION}-%{RELEASE}.%{ARCH}\n' pam
pam-0.77-50.x86_64
pam-0.77-50.i386

warning: /etc/pam.d/other created as /etc/pam.d/other.rpmnew
warning: /etc/security/access.conf created as /etc/security/access.conf.rpmnew
warning: /etc/security/chroot.conf created as /etc/security/chroot.conf.rpmnew
warning: /etc/security/console.perms created as /etc/security/console.perms.rpmnew
warning: /etc/security/group.conf created as /etc/security/group.conf.rpmnew
warning: /etc/security/limits.conf created as /etc/security/limits.conf.rpmnew
warning: /etc/security/pam_env.conf created as /etc/security/pam_env.conf.rpmnew
warning: /etc/security/time.conf created as /etc/security/time.conf.rpmnew

Tom

-- 
  T h o m a s   Z e h e t b a u e r   ( TZ251 )
  PGP encrypted mail preferred - KeyID 96FFCB89
      finger thomasz at hostmaster.org for key

"Memory is like gasoline. You use it up when you are running. Of course you
get it all back when you reboot..."
                                        Microsoft Helpdesk


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 481 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20040723/2edadeee/attachment-0002.bin 


More information about the users mailing list