POP3 Server....

[Alexander Dalloz]

Am Fr, den 23.07.2004 schrieb James Marcinek um 19:52:

> Any pro's/cons to these. Is dovecot similar (in the manner which it
> stores emails) to the previous imapd? I'm using the cyrus-imapd for
> OpenGroupware and would lose some functionality if I used something
> like the old wu-imapd... 

> James

dovecot is able to use mbox as well as maildir format. So if coming from
uw-imapd dovecot is the best choice. If you like and need the power and
advanced features of cyrus-imapd - and you have the knowledge and skill
to administer that peace of mailserver software - choose that one. That
when upgrading FC1 to FC2 the cyrus-imapd is installed is an accident by
the system. As with a fresh new install uw-imapd should be exchanged by
dovecot.

Alexander

P.S. Please post plain text mails to this list James, no html formatted
stuff. It even triggers the SPAM detection by the Redhat mail system, as
you can easily see from your mail headers:

X-RedHat-Spam-Warning:  6.219 (******) HTML_MESSAGE,
HTML_MIME_NO_HTML_TAG, MIME_HTML_NO_CHARSET, MIME_HTML_ONLY,
RATWARE_HASH_2,      RATWARE_HASH_2_V2


-- 
Alexander Dalloz | Enger, Germany | GPG key 1024D/ED695653 1999-07-13
Fedora GNU/Linux Core 2 (Tettnang) kernel 2.6.6-1.435.2.3.ad.umlsmp 
Serendipity 20:01:19 up 1 day, 4:49, load average: 0.19, 0.25, 0.27 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20040723/d795376f/attachment-0002.bin