Cyrus-imapd delivery problems on FC2

[Phil Anderson]

Hi,

I'm playing arround with cyrus-imap, as I'm interested in converting our 
site (40 users) from dovecot.  I have been able to get the the server up 
and running without too many problems.  I created the mail boxes (e.g. 
user/pza, user/pza/Junkmail, etc), and was able to copy my mail across 
from the existing dovecot server (running on an alternative port) using 
thunderbird.

However, getting procmail to deliver incoming mail to my cyrus inbox is 
causing all sorts of problems.  My best attempt at a procmail script so 
far is:
=========================================
USER=`basename $HOME`
INBOX="/usr/lib/cyrus-imapd/deliver -a $USER -m user/$USER"
JUNKMAIL="/usr/lib/cyrus-imapd/deliver -a $USER -m user/$USER/Junkmail"
LOGFILE=/tmp/procmail.log
                                                                                

# Check for spam
:0fw
| /usr/bin/spamc -u $USER
                                                                                

# Positive SPAM
:0
* ^X-Spam-Flag: YES$
| $JUNKMAIL
                                                                                

:0
| $INBOX
=========================================

The only changes I have made to my default cyrus configuration is (but 
they don't make any difference to the problem below):
altnamespace: true
unixhierarchysep: true

But for some reson, mail fails to to get to the inbox.  Until I added -v 
to the lmtp command in cyrus.conf, there was nothing unusual in 
maillog.  After adding the -v, I'm getting the following:
=========================================
Jul 31 14:39:56 harry lmtpunix[13440]: accepted connection
Jul 31 14:39:56 harry master[13452]: about to exec 
/usr/lib/cyrus-imapd/lmtpd
Jul 31 14:39:56 harry master[13400]: process 13440 exited, status 75
Jul 31 14:39:56 harry master[13400]: service lmtpunix pid 13440 in BUSY 
state: terminated abnormally
Jul 31 14:39:56 harry lmtpunix[13452]: executed
=========================================

Anyone got any idea what I might be doing wrong with lmtp?

Thanks,
Phil