Where? in small home network should Caching DNS Serve be located?
Johnny Smith
opensource_powered at yahoo.com
Tue Mar 16 18:08:10 UTC 2004
Hi Brian,
i'm not using DHCP.
I thought about using a Caching DNS to get quicker
response when accessing my internal machines when I'm
offline [and possible speeding up access to the net]
My internal machines are listed in /etc/hosts but
access always seems significantly slower when I'm
offline... gotta wonder if /etc/hosts gets read first?
You probably noticed that I have two servers with
firewalls... [LAN] serves web pages to my Local Hosts
[LK] and [NK].
Given that I'm concerned about intra-lan access being
slow.... do you think my putting the caching DNS on
the inside/firewall/server [LAN] would be best?
Thanks for the help
johnny
--- Brian Johnson <bjohnson at johnson-engineering.ca>
wrote:
> It's not worth it for a home network .. but you
> could put it on any linux
> machine that will be on most of the time
>
> I like to use the same machine as the dhcp daemon
> (for simplicity)
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Johnny Smith (opensource_powered at yahoo.com) wrote:
> >
> > I'm wondering if I should set up a Caching DNS
> Server
> > for my home network?
> >
> > And on which machine/s? should I have one?
> >
> > The attached text file shows my network layout.
> >
> > Thanks for your guidance.
> >
> > Johnny
> >
> > __________________________________
> > Do you Yahoo!?
> > Yahoo! Mail - More reliable, more storage, less
> spam
> > http://mail.yahoo.com
>
>
>
> --
> fedora-list mailing list
> fedora-list at redhat.com
> To unsubscribe:
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - More reliable, more storage, less spam
http://mail.yahoo.com
More information about the users
mailing list