Updating VSFTPD from 1.2.0 to 1.2.1.
Rick Stevens
rstevens at vitalstream.com
Wed Mar 17 19:12:36 UTC 2004
George Lemos wrote:
> Thanks for getting back to me Alexander.
>
>
>
>>Am Mi, den 17.03.2004 schrieb George Lemos um 18:03:
>>
>>>I'm working on learning VSFTPD and am setting it up on a fedora fc1
>>>box. The system currently, from the original install, has version
>>>1.2.0. At least that is what the folder says in
>>
>>/usr/share/doc/vsftpd-1.2.0.
>>
>>rpm -q vsftpd
>>
>>this tells you the exact version and patch number of the
>>installed package.
>>
>>
>>>Bare with me as I am green in Linux but learning every day. If I
>>>download vsftpd-1.2.0-5.i386.rpm and enter the command:
>>>
>>>rpm -ihv vsftpd-1.2.0-5.i386.rpm
>>
>>You can install packages easily using the Fedora tool up2date
>>by running
>>
>>up2date-nox -i vsftpd
>>
>>It has the advantage that it automagically resolves
>>dependencies, while the direct install command using rpm
>>might fail when other packages are missing.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> When I run the command
>
> up2date-nox -i vsftpd
>
> I get:
>
> -----
> The following packages you requested are already updated:
> Vsftpd
> -----
>
> But the latest is v1.2.1 according to the website and the package I have
> installed is vsftpd-1.2.0-5
>
> What am I missing?
That there's no RPM built yet for the latest vsftpd in the up2date
repositories. It's not uncommon for RPM versions to lag behind the
tarballs.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
- Rick Stevens, Senior Systems Engineer rstevens at vitalstream.com -
- VitalStream, Inc. http://www.vitalstream.com -
- -
- "You think that's tough? Try herding cats!" -
----------------------------------------------------------------------
More information about the users
mailing list