Config ADSL

[fedora-list]

Hi Alexander (and anyone that has some insight into this problem),

Thanks for your help so far.

The files:

/etc/hosts

and

/etc/resolv.conf

are configured correctly.

The connection still fails, so I have included my routing table for you to see, if it helps:

Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface
165.165.128.1__0.0.0.0________255.255.255.255__UH__0__0__0__ppp0
192.168.1.0____192.168.1.10___255.255.255.0____UG__0__0__0__eth0
192.168.1.0____0.0.0.0________255.255.255.0____U___0__0__0__eth0
169.254.0.0____0.0.0.0________255.255.0.0______U___0__0__0__eth0
127.0.0.0______0.0.0.0________255.0.0.0________U___0__0__0__lo
0.0.0.0________192.168.1.254__0.0.0.0__________UG__0__0__0__eth0

(underscores for legibility purposes ;-P )

The ADSL's IP is 192.168.1.254, host machine eth0 static IP is 192.168.1.10.

I've also set ppp0 as a trusted device in firewall setup if that changes anything.

Thanks in advance.

Regards,

Stuart


On Sat, 01 May 2004 19:52:57 +0200, Alexander Dalloz wrote:

>Am Sa, den 01.05.2004 schrieb fedora-list um 19:17:
>
>> Hi Fedorans.
>>=20
>> Hmmm... I need some insight to solve this one.
>>=20
>> I've set up a FC1 box to access the web through an ADSL device on a UTP n=
>etwork (ie not USB config).
>>=20
>> I can ping DHCP-assigned IP 165.165.144.130 say.
>> I can ping P-t-P addr 165.165.128.1 (gateway?) with mask 255.255.255.255
>
>So the device setup and the routes seem to fit.
>
>> I can't ping DNS 196.25.1.11 say, Ctrl-C shows packet loss.
>
>That has not to say much. ping is not the almighty tool much people take
>it for.
>
>$ ping 196.25.1.11
>PING 196.25.1.11 (196.25.1.11) 56(84) bytes of data.
>=46rom 196.43.11.41 icmp_seq=3D4 Packet filtered
>=46rom 196.43.11.41 icmp_seq=3D5 Packet filtered
>
>You easily see, the filter ICMP.
>
>> I can't ping canonical names www.cnn.com say, Ctrl-C doesn't even report =
>a response.
>
>www.cnn.com filters ICMP packages too. So a ping has to show you 100%
>package loss.
>
>=46rom www.mit.edu I get ping replies. So try that target.
>
>> I've added all sorts of combinations and permutations with 'route add', a=
>lack.
>>=20
>> It seems as though the further one moves away from the low level function=
>ality, the less name resolving etc one 'sees'.
>> I've this going before, but can't remember how.
>> I am aware of the naming issue in the 'Internet Connection Wizard', where=
> one has to enter 'ppp0' as the provider name.
>> Any insight is appreciated.
>>=20
>> Regards,
>>=20
>> Stu@
>
>Check the output of "route", the default route has to point to the ppp
>device.
>Check the settings in /etc/resolv.conf to have valid nameserver entries
>(take the DNS server from your ISP).
>Check /etc/hosts file to have the line for name resolution for
>localhost: 127.0.0.1.
>
>Alexander
>
>
>--=20
>Alexander Dalloz | Enger, Germany | GPG key 1024D/ED695653 1999-07-13
>Fedora GNU/Linux Core 1 (Yarrow) on Athlon CPU kernel 2.4.22-1.2188.nptl
>Sirendipity 19:46:43 up 4 days, 18:35, load average: 0.02, 0.11, 0.09=20
> [ =CE=93=CE=BD=CF=89=CE=B8=CE=B9 =CF=83'=CE=B1=CF=85=CF=
>=84=CE=BF=CE=BD - gnothi seauton ]
> my life is a planetarium - and you are the stars




-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20040501/1a06c444/attachment-0002.html