FC2-test3 & ATI driver
Phil Schaffner
Philip.R.Schaffner at NASA.gov
Wed May 12 15:23:05 UTC 2004
On Wed, 2004-05-12 at 11:05, Dwaine Castle wrote:
> Gentlemen,
>
> I installed FC2-test3 last night -- the complete package.
>
> Motherboard: Supermicro P4STA
> CPU: 1.7GHz
> Memory: 768 MB
> Hard drive: WD 80GB
> CD: HP9900i
> Monitor: Sony CPD200SF
> Video card: ATI 8500 /64MB
>
> I had a lot of difficulty with disc2. I downloaded copies from 3
> different sites and burned each copy to a CD. Md5sums all
> checked out and the Fedora media check also passed each CD.
> However, the installation failed on disc2 every time complaining
> about a missing file. I got around this problem by switching
> disc2 CDs until one finally worked.
>
> I installed all the available patches via up2date.
>
> Everything appears to be working with one exception. My video
> card was miss-identified as an ATI8500LE and this allows me a
> maximum screen resolution of 800x600. I've tried to change it,
> but it goes back to 8500LE. I've downloaded the latest drivers
> from ATI, but they appeared to be designed only for XFree86 and
> it doesn't look like FC2 is using XFree86. I remember reading
> something about Fedora no longer using XFree86 during the
> installation but I was more interested in my installation
> failures. I doubt that I should install the ATI RPM. This seems
> like a hardware configuration issue, but I know that the X server
> is related.
>
> I would like to get my graphics card installed correctly. Can
> anyone explain what is going wrong?
You're on the wrong list. These issues been discussed extensively on
test-list. Search/post to fedora-test-list at redhat.com and check
Bugzilla.
Short/direct answer - ATI needs to fix their drivers. Until then,
should be possible to get xorg support going without ATI-proprietary
acceleration.
Phil
More information about the users
mailing list