To be or not be?

[Jeff Vian]

Scot L. Harris wrote:

>On Mon, 2004-05-24 at 05:01, Peter Cannon wrote:
>  
>
>>Hi Scott
>>    
>>
>
>  
>
>>Thanks for the reply I'm a bit busy at the momemnt but will speak/email you 
>>later today I would like to stay in touch as we both have the same machines.
>>
>>P.S. I upgraded my Dell
>>
>>Regards
>>
>>Peter Cannon
>>    
>>
>
>Not a problem.  I did get my wireless card working finally.  Posted
>another message with the details on that.  
>
>I still don't like the way the system tools handle the card.  Actually
>they don't really handle it.  If you go into the configuration tool it
>lists the card as a xircom which is incorrect.  
>
>The funniest thing is I do have a xircom card which I had figured would
>cause me all kinds of grief when I plug that in and take the wireless
>card out.  Surprisingly when I did that the card worked (ethernet
>portion, have not tried the modem yet).  Will find out tonight if the
>wireless card will still work.  They both end up with the same name
>(eth0).  
>
>I would have expected this to be handled differently, a separate
>interface defined for each. (eth0, eth1)  
>
>Good luck with your laptop.
>
>  
>
You will have 2 interface names, IF both cards are plugged in at the 
same time.

>  
>