glibc version problem: What are my options?
fropeter at online.no
Sun Nov 7 04:44:55 UTC 2004
Thank you so much for the answer! The problem is now solved.
Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 07, 2004 at 12:41:54AM +0100, Frode Petersen wrote:
>>symbol errno, version GLIBC_2.0 not defined in file libc.so.6 with link
> libkernel32.so has been built incorrectly (not including <errno.h> before
> using errno as mandated by standards).
Just out of curiosity: Is this something I can fix myself, or is it a
distro thing, or even a Rational thing? (I suspect the first, but...)
> As a workaround, you can run the application with LinuxThreads, i.e.
> LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.4.1 /opt/rational//releases/rose.2003.06.00/i386_linux2/bin/rjavarelay options
I made a script setting the variable, running the rose startup script
and finally removing the variable again. I guess any program started
while Rose is running would also be using the older libraries, but that
is OK, or isn't it..?
> Though, if you e.g. googled for errno GLIBC_2.0, you'd find an answer too.
I obviously need to 'de-narrow' my searches...
Thanks again for the help!
More information about the users