yum vs. apt

Phil Schaffner Philip.R.Schaffner at nasa.gov
Tue Nov 23 14:52:16 UTC 2004


On Tue, 2004-11-23 at 09:24 -0500, Mark Bradford wrote:
> I have been using apt for installs and updating/upgrading, but am 
> noticing most of the conversation here seems to favor yum.  Is there any 
> significant difference between the two, or are there any issues or 
> conflicts in using both?

FC3 repositories seem to be dropping apt support, and apt does not
handle multi-arch (i386 vs x86_64, PPC, ...).  Has been some talk of an
apt version able to use the new yum repository meta-data, but so far
seems to be vaporware.  I've pretty much dropped apt in favor of yum,
but apt/synaptic still seem viable for FC2 and earlier.

Phil





More information about the users mailing list