yum vs. apt
Phil Schaffner
Philip.R.Schaffner at nasa.gov
Tue Nov 23 14:52:16 UTC 2004
On Tue, 2004-11-23 at 09:24 -0500, Mark Bradford wrote:
> I have been using apt for installs and updating/upgrading, but am
> noticing most of the conversation here seems to favor yum. Is there any
> significant difference between the two, or are there any issues or
> conflicts in using both?
FC3 repositories seem to be dropping apt support, and apt does not
handle multi-arch (i386 vs x86_64, PPC, ...). Has been some talk of an
apt version able to use the new yum repository meta-data, but so far
seems to be vaporware. I've pretty much dropped apt in favor of yum,
but apt/synaptic still seem viable for FC2 and earlier.
Phil
More information about the users
mailing list