Why no /proc/config.gz on FC-3 kernel?

[Dag Wieers]

On Sat, 27 Nov 2004, Dave Jones wrote:

> On Sun, Nov 28, 2004 at 01:06:19AM +0000, Timothy Murphy wrote:
>
>  > Of course one does not _have_ to follow Torvalds,
>  > and one certainly does not have to say Yes to all kernel options.
>  > 
>  > However, if you are going to save .config, I don't see any advantage
>  > in _not_ doing it as suggested by Torvalds (or his team).
> 
> Name *one* good reason for doing /proc/config.gz over
> Copying it to /boot/.   I've seen this proposed multiple
> times (on-list and in bugzilla), and not seen a single compelling
> reason to turn it on.

One good reason to do it is that you can be sure the config matches 
exactly what is currently running.

--   dag wieers,  dag at wieers.com,  http://dag.wieers.com/   --
[Any errors in spelling, tact or fact are transmission errors]