RFC: cleaning up updates and updates-testing

[Edward]

Tom Diehl wrote:
> On Thu, 9 Sep 2004, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> 
> 
>>At the moment, the Fedora updates tree is somewhat out of
>>hand (look, wow - 27G). 
>>
>>Does anyone have any specific and concrete objections to 
>>removing older, superceded, updates?
> 
> 
> I vote to nukem!! If someone wants them they have been around forever
> and they ahould be archiving them locally. IMO for the most part they are
> a waste of space and although disk is cheap when you are running a public
> mirror it gets expensive after a while.
> 
> Just my $.02
> 
> Tom
> 
> 

Yup, what he said...

Ed.