What is the official/semi-official positon of Fedora on KDE?

[Arthur Pemberton]

Claude Jones wrote:

> Leaf wrote:
>
>> On Saturday 09 April 2005 09:48, Claude Jones wrote:
>>
>>> Could you explain your last comment. I ran KDE 3.4 when I brought up a
>>> new FC4t1 box. I couldn't find any remarkable differences between it 
>>> and
>>> my current implementation - I found a couple of annoyances, however. 
>>> The
>>> list of menu options had been cut way back, and even the Control Center
>>> was not present as an option and had to be called up by a command. I'm
>>> sure I missed things - from a read of the release notes, it seems like
>>> many of the improvements had to with accessibility, and obviously for
>>> those who need them, those features are extremely important. But, what
>>> else has been improved?
>>
>>
>>
>> That is all odd, my Kmenu options fill the screen and the Control 
>> Center has been there from the moment I installed.  As an FYI I 
>> installed FC3 with none of the Gnome packages and all of the KDE 
>> (from the CDs).  Then I updated everything, including KDesktop to 
>> 3.4.  I haven't seen the issues you mention.
>>
>
> But you upgraded from the previous version. Mine was the default 
> installation under FC4t1. I changed nothing during setup regarding 
> KDE, except to choose it as my default desktop after FC4 was up and 
> running. The issues I describe are how it came up under a default 
> install - now granted, FC4t1 is what it is, and by final release, many 
> things will change, including the issues I describe. Since you 
> upgraded from a previous version, under FC3, your experience was 
> different. But, my question is, what are the big improvements in KDE 
> over the current version, apart from the accessibility improvements; 
> the FC4 install issues are obviously not a proper subject here.
>
I think the content of the menus are up to the distro packers, not the 
KDE devs. So chances are the Fedora guys just left Kmenu a bit empt. 
Maybe it's due to testing.