Netgear PS101 configuration...

[Alexander Dalloz]

Am Mo, den 11.04.2005 schrieb Dr. Michael J. Chudobiak um 13:44:

> Hah, not so simple - beware the Netgear PS110 - it doesn't play nicely 
> with firewalls and iptables due to an unconventional use of port 
> numbers. (See http://article.gmane.org/gmane.network.guarddog/825 and 
> http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=133064)
> 
> If you are running a firewall on your computer, expect trouble.

You are right. You find a thread in this list's archive where I
contribute an analyze and solution. I agree that the way the Netgear
acts is incompatible with the default iptables setup as the TCP
sequences it sends are not recognized as ESTABLISHED or RELATED.

> - Mike

Alexander


-- 
Alexander Dalloz | Enger, Germany | GPG http://pgp.mit.edu 0xB366A773
legal statement: http://www.uni-x.org/legal.html
Fedora Core 2 GNU/Linux on Athlon with kernel 2.6.10-1.771_FC2smp 
Serendipity 14:11:42 up 12 days, 11:38, load average: 0.06, 0.09, 0.10 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20050411/f1f8a328/attachment-0002.bin