brute force ssh attack

Matthew Miller mattdm at mattdm.org
Wed Apr 27 21:14:37 UTC 2005


On Wed, Apr 27, 2005 at 05:21:45PM +0100, Nigel Wade wrote:
> >Looks like it spread to root from a user account in this case. Threat is
> >obviously somewhat greater than 0. Caution and good practices are still
> >required.
> There's no evidence that the virus escalated its own privilege. More likely 
> that a root process executed an infected binary.

I agree -- and that's exactly why this shouldn't be dismissed as "0 threat".

-- 
Matthew Miller           mattdm at mattdm.org        <http://www.mattdm.org/>
Boston University Linux      ------>                <http://linux.bu.edu/>
Current office temperature: 80 degrees Fahrenheit.




More information about the users mailing list