Disk defragmenter in Linux
Tim
ignored_mailbox at yahoo.com.au
Sat Dec 24 09:29:55 UTC 2005
Tim:
>>> I was under the impression that the directory structure was recorded in
>>> manner that's different from how the files are stored.
Mike McCarty:
>> You may know something that I do not. I thought everything was inodes.
David L. Gehrt:
> If you look in the Linux header files you can see the structure of a
> directory entry in a directory. A directory is a structured file but
> one treated differently by the OS because the directory bit is set in its
> inode. But like other files, in some sense, it is just bits on the
> platter, albeit with some structure, as such a directory IS subject to
> possible fragmentation.
I was thinking of the following, though I may be mixing up this file
system with another type: The directory structure being stored some
distance away from the files, so that one doesn't tend to fragment the
other.
It's been a long time since I read about the nitty-gritty of filing
systems, it's not the sort of thing I do for fun. ;-\ It tends to be
the sort of thing you read as you're diagnosing some condition
(somewhere along the line, someone explains how it works behind the
scenes).
--
Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored.
I read messages from the public lists.
More information about the users
mailing list