FC4 Pine replacement?

[Tom Diehl]

On Tue, 27 Dec 2005, Res wrote:

> On Mon, 26 Dec 2005, Devon Harding wrote:
>
>> Is there a replacement for Pine on FC4?  Alternatives?
>
> I always use the source from  ftp://ftp.cac.washington.edu/pine/
> just like I use source for a few other things micro$lop err i mean RH decide 
> after 10 years they dont want us using :)
>
> However if you go to that site the good guys at cac have even produced an rpm 
> for pine users on RH since RH wont :)

You make it sound like this is a Red Hat problem. Just to be clear, lack of
pine is not Red Hat's fault. It is WU's fault. Pine is not open source. If
it was I am sure it would be in the distro or extras.

Oh BTW mutt is NOT even close to being a replacment for pine. Not unless
you have never used pine and just want a text based MUA.

The closest thing I have been able to find to pine is something called cone [1].
So far though I keep going back to pine since that is what my fingers are
trained to use. :-)

Regards,

Tom

[1] http://www.courier-mta.org/cone/index.html