Why questions don't get answered, or "No, I've already RTFM, tell me the answer!"

[Mike McCarty]

John Summerfied wrote:
> Kam Leo wrote:
> 
>> On 12/29/05, Rahul Sundaram <sundaram at redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Kam Leo wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> On 12/29/05, Dave Stevens <geek at uniserve.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> and there's fedorafaq.org. not comprehensive but pretty good and as 
>>>>> far as I
>>>>> know everything there is accurate, easy to read, etc.
>>>>>
>>>>> d
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The problem with all these fedora*.org sites is that some are and some
>>>> are not officially affiliated with the main htttp://fedora.redhat.com
>>>> site. The fedora marketing droids need to really get the "fedora"
>>>> branding straightened out. There are too many of these "fedora*.org"
>>>> sites popping up and the ones officially affiliated are not tightly
>>>> coupled to the main site.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> The only official ones are http://fedora.redhat.com and
>>> http://fedoraproject.org as listed in
>>> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Websites and they are pretty well coupled
>>> together. Rest of the community websites are listed in
> 
> 
> for some reason I thought fedoralegacy.org was official.

Official in what sense? It is not sponsored by Red Hat Co.

[snip]

Mike
-- 
p="p=%c%s%c;main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}";main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}
This message made from 100% recycled bits.
You have found the bank of Larn.
I can explain it for you, but I can't understand it for you.
I speak only for myself, and I am unanimous in that!